PH410 Medical Ethics Essay Week four
PH410 Medical Ethics Composition Week 4
This week we all watched a video about a person named Paul who contains strong Christian morals and whom desired to enter into the medical field. Two scenarios had been involved. Circumstance 1 discussed Paul when he was signing up to medical schools. When he attended interview for these universities and was asked his stance upon abortion, he responded genuinely saying he was anti-abortion based upon his religious beliefs, and was rejected entrance into the school. Situation 2 revealed Paul post medical degree seeking function. He interviewed at a little family practice clinic in which the majority of the physicians were pro-abortion. This individual declined the work offer. However the clinic would not mind his stance on abortion, he did not desire to be the group in his stance. I believe that in the first scenario, the college was wrong for not acknowledging him based upon his personal, religious belief, and in scenario 2, I believe the family practice clinic was right in accepting him, but it was Paul who have ultimately made the decision not to function there, as a result of his community view. In scenario 1, the medical schools mistakenly discriminated against Paul due to his faith based belief. Based on the U. H. Department of Education, below federal rules, schools that receive money from the authorities are restricted from denying applicants depending on religious perception (http://www2.ed.gov, 2004). In an document from the National Catholic Sign-up, the article points out " even though the law forbids explicit splendour against pro-life candidates, that prohibit colleges from inquiring about abortion during the selecting process. However, this situation makes a loophole just right to drive a 52 pick up throughвЂќ (Kuebler, 2011). One could easily dispute in the school's defense: that by denying Paul and other pro-life candidates admission to medical universities, this would lead to less future close-mindedness in the...
References: Antoniou, S. A., Antoniou, G. A., Granderath, F. A., Mavroforou, A., Giannoukas, A. D., & Antoniou, A. I. (2010). Reflections of the hippocratic pledge in modern medicine. Globe Journal of Surgery, 34(12), 3075-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0604-3
Kuebler, D. (2011, September 8). The case against pro-life medical professionals: bias starts at mediterranean sea school interview. National Catholic Register. Recovered from http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/the-case-against-pro-life-physicians-bias-begins-at-med-school-interview
Merrill, M. C. (1996). Deontology or perhaps teleology: integrity based on work or in consequences. Retrieved from http://www.uiowa.edu/~c019168/168s6online3.html
Title VI and Title IX spiritual discrimination in schools and colleges. (2004). Retrieved via http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/religious-rights2004.html
Wiebe, E., Durepos, G., & Mills, A. J. (2010). Encyclopedia of case study analysis. [Adobe Digital Editions]. http://dx.doi.org/474264